DISCLAIMER: Yes, this book is more than 150 years old, and you probably had to read it in school. But in case you’re worried about these things, know that there are spoilers ahead.

Little Women by Louisa May Alcott was on my list of classics to read this year. I can’t believe I’d never read it, especially when I’ve always quite enjoyed the movie version with Winona Ryder. Yes, young me did NOT need to read a book before seeing the movie. For shame! But, I’ve read it now. And what I really need to say is JO, WHY YOU SO STUPID?!

Jo rejecting Laurie is even worse in the book than it was in the movie. It feels like an enormous literary injustice. And Jo does not let him down easy: “I’ve done my best, but you won’t be reasonable, and it’s selfish of you to keep teasing for what I can’t give. I shall always be fond of you, very fond indeed, as a friend, but I’ll never marry you, and the sooner you believe it, the better for both of us.”

In her defense, Laurie is a bit of a bonehead and didn’t want to hear what she was saying. But wow, Jo…harsh. This scene is now on my newly formed list of most frustrating things I’ve ever seen a character that I love do.

I loved Little Women though, despite my frustration. Or maybe I loved it because of my frustration? Maybe it wouldn’t be so memorable and beautiful had Jo just done what we all wanted her to do. The whole point, really, was her independence. She is such a strong, feminist character, especially considering the era in which Alcott wrote the novel.

Oh who am I kidding? I would’ve eaten up that love story! And guess what? I’m about to!

The forthcoming novel Jo and Laurie by Margaret Stohl and Melissa de la Cruz is a romantic retelling of Little Women. One where Jo and Laurie end up together! It is due to hit shelves in early June, and I’m already preordering my copy. Because part of me doesn’t care if it defeats the purpose of Jo as an independent woman. I want that love story. I need that love story. I cannot wait to read it.

What do you think? Let us know in the comments!


  • While I agree Jo was harsh, it was consistent with her character. Jo wasn’t the best at keeping her temper and being thoughtful before she spoke. I think she got tired of Laurie’s insistence that she was wrong and she kinds of blew up at him. It is one of her “faults.” I don;t know if I would like to see Jo and Laurie together, though. Queer readings of Little Women see both Jo and Laurie as queer or Jo and Professor Baher as queer. While I am not sure I see Laurie as queer, I definitely see Jo as such, especially since Louisa May Alcott herself stated several times that she had been in love with many women but never a man. Because Alcott often said that Jo resembled her, I think it is a better retelling of Jo not marrying at all, or having a “Boston Marriage” while running her school.

    • Interesting. I can definitely see Jo as a queer character though I’m with you on Laurie, not so much. Perhaps her rejection of him, the guy basically all the ladies wanted, is even more support for that line. I totally understand why the novel went as it did, but it doesn’t stop the romantic in me, who was once convinced of being in love with my bestie, from fantasizing that they get together.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *